Global Leaders in Procurement & Negotiations (PSCMInstitute.com)

Category: win-win

  • Negotiating with Suppliers that have ALL the Bargaining Power

    I have more and more clients that are struggling with pandemic negotiations with suppliers who hold all the bargaining power.  There’s really only 2 things that can be done to address this:

    1. Change the bargaining power dynamic
    2. Drive Investigative Negotiations and Value Creation

    Or you can keep hammering the supplier on price, but you are already doing that, and you were doing it before the pandemic too.   And right now it’s not working, or you wouldn’t be reading this I suppose. 

    Changing the bargaining power dynamic comes down to identifying the source of the supplier’s bargaining power, and then taking steps to reduce the value of that source and/or increase your bargaining power in turn. 

    The end goal of changing the bargaining power dynamics is to create a circumstance where your offer is perceived as being more desirable than it was previously. 

    I remember something Carlsberg Beer did with their soda ash suppliers (glass bottles are made of 70% sand and 30% soda ash).  The sand was plentiful, the soda ash was not.  They were dealing with a powerful oligopoly – almost a cartel of sorts.

    The soda ash suppliers were dictating the terms and getting them, because there were few alternatives.  Carlsberg didn’t know what to do.  The source of the supplier’s bargaining power was the oligopoly and Carlsberg’s lower volume. 

    Carlsberg couldn’t change the oligopoly, they couldn’t use something other than soda ash, and they couldn’t wave a wand and suddenly increase their volume requirements.  

    Or could they…..

    Carlsberg decided to take a disruptive sourcing move and talk with supply chain partners buying soda ash as well.  They put their requirements together and went to the oligopoly with a massive volume that was irresistible.  All in one take it or leave it contract offer.

    Now the oligopoly companies were going head to head for the business and a sweet deal was landed.  The bargaining power dynamics, once hard as steel, were melted away and the tables were turned.  

    This is just one example of how to change bargaining power dynamics.  You have to dissect the source of the bargaining power and take moves to undo it.  

    The other thing you can do is to drive Investigative Negotiations and Value Creation.   I have endless client examples of this.

    One example is with Tata Steel.   Tata is probably the biggest company in India – a massive conglomerate that has no equal elsewhere in the world that I’ve seen.  You can’t breathe air or drink a cup of coffee in India without Tata being involved.      

    They were negotiating with a German mining equipment supplier, the best in the business.   The Germans tend to do business cut and dry.  They had a hard as steel fixed pricing schedule.  Tata wasn’t going to get a single penny deviation from that schedule. 

    Tata thought about this problem, did some research – Investigative Negotiations – and realized that the mining equipment supplier had zero foothold in India.  How could this be?  But it was true. 

    That meant that they didn’t understand how commercia precedents worked in India.  They explained to the supplier that the volume at stake was not just that of Tata’s. 

    They explained that when Tata buys from a given supplier, this is an implicit seal of approval that the entire country of India uses to start buying from that supplier.  They then went through a myriad of examples. 

    They explained to the supplier that whichever company wins this business also wins the whole of India’s mining business.   This suddenly made the pie much bigger – Value Creation

    The rigid German supplier came back on their hands and knees with an incredible proposal to win the Indian marketplace.  Their first deviation ever from their hard pricing schedule.  

    Tata signed the deal, whereby the German party made far less money at the transaction level, but stood to gain FAR more in the aggregate from this new marketplace.   Both parties were thrilled with the outcome. 

    That’s exactly  how you do Investigative Negotiations and Value Creation. 

    If you are trying to solve your supplier bargaining power problems with management escalations and hammering the supplier, you’ll lose a lot of hair, but you won’t accomplish much else.     

    Read this Twice:  Doing what you’ve always been doing in negotiations will only deliver you the same results that you’ve always been getting.  And that’s not good enough.

    Now go off and do something wonderful.  Be your best!

    Omid G.

    “THE Godfather of Negotiation Planning” ~ Intel Corp

    www.PSCMInstitute.com 

    P.S. If you want to be a ROCK STAR at driving strategies like the above, check out the 100% online CPSCM™ Certification Program at https://pscminstitute.com/certification/.  You will see the materials and hear my voice throughout, as your own private instructor.  With almost 50% of the Fortune 100 having invested in CPSCM™, there is no equal in the marketplace.  Invest in your career and results today.  

  • Writing the Other Party’s Negotiation Victory Speech

    Something we focus very little on in negotiations is how to make the other party look and feel successful out of the deal.  All of our focus is on how to make ourselves look, feel, and actually be successful in negotiations – and letting our management chain know. 

    But the other party has a management chain too.  And do you know what happens when they look and feel cleaned out in negotiations?  The other negotiator may get demoted.  They may get a bad performance review. 

    Additionally, their management chain may deprioritize your account.  They won’t pick up the phone. And every single time you ask for something small, you’ll get an invoice for it.  They’ll get their money back. 

    You have to have a CONSCIOUS STRATEGY to ensure that the other party looks and feels successful out of the deal.  It’s good for them.  It’s good for you.  They’ll treat your account better, and they’ll service you better.  They’ll want you to be successful.  

    Probably the best example of this you’re going to find is in the National Football League.  Even if you’re not into sports, you will learn endlessly by watching sports negotiations play out.  If you want to be a world class negotiator, this has to be part of your ongoing training regimen.

    I just saw an announcement from a football team that they signed a much better than average football player to the richest deal for his position in NFL history – 5 years, USD $100 million.  It’s a mind blowing deal for someone who is very good but not the best at his position. 

    But the details have not yet been made available.  This is intentional, to let the player and his agent both bask in the limelight. 

    The player gets to say that nobody in the history of the NFL has ever gotten more at that position, and the agent gets to say that they were the one who brokered such a deal – enticing other players to sign up with him.

    And the NFL team gets to bask in the limelight too.  The message is “We pay our players above market value.  Come play for our team.  We pay more than anyone else.”

    Now what will the details of the deal look like?  I can tell you without them ever having been announced. 

    It’s probably in reality a 3 or 4 year deal that has been structured as a 5 year deal.  The last 1 or 2 years will have a ridiculous salary that the team will never pay, because they will have put a termination for convenience clause just before those years kick in. 

    The team knows it, the player knows it, and the player’s agent knows it.  They all know that it’s really, say, just a 3 year deal for $52M – fair market value for the player.

    All 3 parties agree to add artificial years and compensation the backend that all 3 parties know will never happen.  It’s all about writing each other’s victory speech. 

    And when the actual details go out, nobody will talk about them, because it’s not to anyone’s benefit to do so. 

    And when year 3 or 4 rolls around and they release the player or renegotiate a new and more reasonable salary, nobody in the public will remember what was announced when the deal was first struck.  Nothing lost.

    This is just one of many strategies that can be employed to write the other party’s victory speech.  We go through this in detail in the CPSCM™ Certification Program.  Contingency agreements can be put in place.  The way in which concessions are captured and communicated can be modified. 

    There are many ways to go. But this has to be part of your arsenal.  It’s good for all parties involved, and you’ll get better results as well.  

    Now go off and do something wonderful.  Be your best!  

    Omid G.

    “THE Godfather of Negotiation Planning” ~ Intel Corp

    P.S.  We are constantly making CPSCM™ even better.   Two new game changing modules (Module XIII & XIV) have been added to the CPSCM™ Certification Program.  Have you seen them?  Check it out!  https://pscminstitute.com/cpscm-for-individuals/

  • The Fallacy of At The Table Negotiations

    The Fallacy of At The Table Negotiations

    I saw an article just this last week in LinkedIn describing different scenarios for buyer and seller to go back and forth on negotiation terms for best outcomes – offer, response, counter offer, counter response, etc. 

    It was touted as a game changing system, and was even given a name and trademarked, indicating it was something new and innovative. 

    It’s something I’ve been familiar with since the early 90’s, and I regret that it’s still being taught.

    If you go back to the invention of currency, and probably much earlier, this is how we always negotiated.  Each party trying to get more of the pie in return for less of what they have to offer in return. 

    This was the earliest form of what I call “At the Table Negotiations”.

    Meaning, this trademarked system is hardly new.  Yet it’s highly glorified.  It’s what we picture when there are the greatest stakes of all – with parties intensely negotiating at the table. 

    But all of that is for people who learned how to negotiate by watching TV shows and movies.  Or perhaps as a child, watching your parents barter at the local market. You’re not going to win any negotiations this way.

    Read this twice: Negotiations are won and lost before they ever start.  They are won FAR before you ever engage in At the Table Negotiations.  Anyone who tries to teach you how to win negotiations at the table is at best still stuck in the 1950’s.

    There really needs to be a well rounded approach for achieving success in negotiations.  In fact, the very definition of negotiation success needs to be redefined.

    The 1950’s and prior definition of negotiation success is how much of the pie you can get.  It’s parasitic negotiations.   You gain at the other party’s expense.  Value is being transferred instead of created.

    Negotiation strategies need to involve value creation before going to the table.  This involves researching what keeps the other party awake at night, and creating strategies to help make them more successful out of the deal, while costing your side very little. 

    This is why you are paid the big bucks, and it’s not optional in high stakes negotiations. 

    The other piece that has to be done is bargaining power analysis.  If you find yourself in a negotiation where you lack bargaining power, then you’ve driven yourself to the middle of the desert knowing you have no gas or drinking water.  You can’t let it get to that stage.

    You need to do an in depth analysis of what the source of their bargaining power is.  What exactly and specifically is it that gives them their bargaining power?  You need to understand this FAR in advance of negotiations very, very well.

    What might it be?  Almost anything.  Here are just a few:

    • Perception of highest quality
    • Monopolistic supplier
    • Switching or startup costs associated with adding or switching to new supplier
    • End user or business unit allegiance
    • Production capability
    • Access to critical material(s)
    • Etc.

    Then you need to architect a strategy to change that bargaining power to your favor.  The shift may not happen right away – it may even take years – but you can conspicuously lay the seeds right under the supplier’s nose.  They’ll get the picture. 

    Then there’s internal negotiations.  Most external negotiations fail because of failed internal negotiations.  Being fully aligned on the SOW/Spec hardly qualifies as internal negotiations alignment. 

    There’s alignment regarding procurement and negotiation strategy, sourcing approach, business shifting, standardization, alternative materials, timing, external communications, internal communications, management influencing, deal positioning, cost modeling, vendor evaluation criteria, and so much more.

    This is just skimming the top of things that need to be done in advance of At the Table Negotiations.  If all you are doing is getting trained in and executing to At the Table Strategies, you are stuck in some very old quicksand. 

    The CPSCM™ Certification Program – already invested in by half of the Fortune 100 – will position you to fast track your career and be a Negotiation Godfather.  In exactly 32 days, a huge announcement is coming and all of you need to be paying attention.   CPSCM™ Certification is going to be attainable by everyone.  Don’t miss it.

    Now go off and do something wonderful.

    Be your best! 

    Omid G.

    “THE Godfather of Negotiation Planning” ~ Intel Corp

    www.CenterforPSCMexcellence.org